The current cache of this site might still show our old
positioning: lead generation for NZ insurance brokers. That didn't
land. I'm telling you the full story because the alternative is
pretending it never happened, which is exactly the kind of
agency-class behaviour I built this version of the business to
avoid.
I started with insurance because I run growth for Gerrard's
Insurance as CMO. I know that market in my bones. I figured if I
could install the playbook somewhere I'd already proved it worked,
the rest would follow. Reasonable thesis. Wrong market.
Here's what I missed. NZ insurance brokers as a buying segment are
relationship-led, slow-moving, and have an unusually quiet buying
signal. The work itself was good. The clients I did pick up were
happy. But the segment didn't have the buying urgency
the offer needed. Every conversation took six months to mature.
The owners weren't waking up at 3am worried about channels
changing because their channels weren't changing fast enough yet.
Three months in I sat with the numbers and made the call to pivot.
Not blow up the agency. Pivot. Same operator. Same craft.
Different segment. The new lane is sales-led NZ specialists where
the AI shift has already arrived at the kitchen table.
Mortgage and lending brokers watching ChatGPT answer rate
questions and bank apps eat the easy 20%-deposit clients. Tax
advisors and insolvency practitioners watching DIY platforms and
AI tools nibble the bottom of the funnel.
I don't work with insurance brokers anymore. I'm too involved in
one as CMO at Gerrard's. That's also why I know exactly how this
category buys, what makes the FAP / FMA / aggregator regime tick,
and where a marketing pitch sets off the compliance alarm in a
broker's head.
If you spend money with an operator who can't say "I tried this
and it didn't work, here's what I learned," you're buying a
story, not a service. I'd rather you read the full pivot here than
discover it in month six.